
Common Lemon Law Myths
Dispelling Myths About Lemons
There are a number of myths about lemon laws that can affect how a person views a troublesome car, truck, SUV, computer or other product. At the National Lemon Law Center we want to dispel these myths and help our clients understand the truth about state and federal lemon laws. While we are happy to offer you a free consultation, we have also listed some common lemon law myths below.
Contact a lemon law attorney today to learn more about what can be done to help your claim!
Myth: Lemon laws only apply to motor vehicles
Fact: The truth of the matter is that lemon laws may apply to all types of consumer products that include warranties. This means that cars, trucks, SUVs, motorcycles, computers, home appliances and a number of other products may all be covered under your state’s lemon laws, as well as under federal lemon law.
Myth: I can’t file a claim for a used product.
Fact: Even if you purchased a used vehicle or other product, you may still be able to file a claim or lawsuit if the product had a warranty or if repairs were promised.
Helping People Nationwide
Read Our Customer Reviews
-
In 2013, I leased a high-end car, but immediately discovered a number of problems, especially sudden braking or sudden acceleration. After taking the car to various authorized dealerships, none were able to fix the problem. The manufacturer was unwilling to admit that a problem existed. After talking with a number of attorneys, I was impressed that Alex concentrated on lemon-law cases. I sent Alex all of my detailed records, he gave me a likely timeframe, and he was able to get the manufacturer to take the car back within that time-frame. I think highly of his services and would recommend him in such lemon-law cases.Wes
-
I got screwed on a new car. After fighting the dealership on my own for 6 months and getting nowhere, Alex was able to get me a refund within a reasonable amount of time (about six months, without court). I will use him again if I have to.Jordan R.
-
My initial hearing with the State Attorney General was dismissed, and I decided to give it one more try through an attorney.I initially contacted the firm in early February 2013. They responded in three days requesting for documents necessary to review the case. Once I sent them the documents, they responded within a week to let me know that they will take the case. by mid-March, they let me know that they are working with the car company. Yesterday (4/16/13), I went out to my local dealership for them to buyback my car. They paid for the remaining balance of my loan, and paid me the difference in check.Throughout the whole process, Mr. Simanovsky directly communicated with me through either by phone or e-mail to let me know what was going on, which I found to be very pleasantly surprising.This was the kind of service that you always hope for, but not normally expected to receive.Thomas B.

